Samsung Australia has been ordered by the Federal Court docket to pay a $14 million (about $9.7 million USD) tremendous for a deceptive advertising marketing campaign, as noticed by PhoneArena. The adverts in query prompt that a few of its water resistant telephones might be utilized in swimming pools and at seashores, which Samsung’s personal web site advises in opposition to.

The adverts ran between March 2016 and October 2018, depicting Galaxy A-series, S7-series, and S8-series telephones. They’re all rated IP68, which suggests you possibly can totally submerge them in water for an prolonged period of time — on this case, as much as half-hour to a depth of 1.5 meters (about 5 toes). However that safety solely extends to freshwater — saltwater and chlorinated pool water are a distinct matter.

Samsung’s adverts implied that it’s okay to take your telephone browsing. It isn’t advisable to take your telephone browsing.
Picture: Australian Competitors and Shopper Fee / Samsung Australia

The Australian Competitors and Shopper Fee (or ACCC) took Samsung Australia to process on these claims in 2019, and the Federal Court docket is ordering Samsung to pay up. The ACCC’s chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb says that the group reviewed a whole lot of complaints from Galaxy house owners who say their telephones malfunctioned or stopped working altogether after being uncovered to water. The weak hyperlink appears to be the charging port: if the telephone is utilized in saltwater or chlorinated water after which charged earlier than the port is completely dry, corrosion can happen.

It’s all a superb reminder that even a robust waterproof ranking like IP68 comes with sure limitations. Finest to err on the facet of warning earlier than you imagine one thing you see on TV and take a swim together with your smartphone.

Supply hyperlink

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.